Dailystocks.com - Ticker-based level links to all the information for the Stocks you own. Portal for Daytrading and Finance and Investing Web Sites
DailyStocks.com
What's New
Site Map
Help
FAQ
Log In
Home Quotes/Data/Chart Warren Buffett Fund Letters Ticker-based Links Education/Tips Insider Buying Index Quotes Forums Finance Site Directory
OTCBB Investors Daily Glossary News/Edtrl Company Overviews PowerRatings China Stocks Buy/Sell Indicators Company Profiles About Us
Nanotech List Videos Magic Formula Value Investing Daytrading/TA Analysis Activist Stocks Wi-fi List FOREX Quote ETF Quotes Commodities
Make DailyStocks Your Home Page AAII Ranked this System #1 Since 1998 Bookmark and Share


Welcome!
Welcome to the investing community at DailyStocks where we believe we have some of the most intelligent investors around. While we have had an online presence since 1997 as a portal, we are just beginning the forums section now. Our moderators are serious investors with MBA and CFAs with practical experience wwell-versed in fundamental, value, or technical investing. We look forward to your contribution to this community.

Recent Topics
Article by DailyStocks_admin    (10-11-12 04:07 AM)

Description

Filed with the SEC from Sep 27 to Oct 03:

Intralinks Holdings (IL)
Discovery Equity Partners disclosed it owns 3,151,707 shares (5.7%) after it sold 852,524 from Aug. 17 through Sept. 26 at prices ranging from $5.35 to $6.82 each.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Overview

IntraLinks is a leading global provider of Software-as-a-Service (“SaaS”) solutions for securely managing content, exchanging critical business information and enabling inter-enterprise collaboration. Our cloud-based solutions allow organizations to control, track, search and exchange sensitive information inside and outside the firewall, all within a secure and easy-to-use environment. Our customers rely on our cost-effective solutions to manage large amounts of electronic information, accelerate information-intensive business processes, reduce time to market, optimize critical information workflow, meet regulatory and risk management requirements, and collaborate with business counterparties in a secure, auditable and compliant manner. We help our customers eliminate many of the inherent risks and inefficiencies of email, fax, courier services and other existing solutions to collaborate and exchange information.

At our founding in 1996, we introduced cloud-based collaboration for the debt capital markets industry and shortly thereafter extended our solutions to merger and acquisition transactions. Today we service enterprises and governmental agencies in over 63 countries across a variety of industries, including financial services, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, consumer, energy, industrial, legal, insurance, real estate and technology.

We deliver our solutions entirely through a cloud-based model where they are available on-demand over the Internet using a multi-tenant SaaS architecture in which a single instance of our software serves all of our customers. We sell our solutions directly through sales team with industry-specific expertise, and indirectly through a customer referral network and channel partners. In 2011, we generated $213.5 million in revenue, of which approximately 40% was derived from sales across 63 countries outside of the United States. We have generated positive cash flow from operations on an annual basis since 2003, including $54.7 million in 2011.

IntraLinks Exchanges

IntraLinks Exchanges are our primary solution for collaboration within and among organizations. They integrate the capabilities of content management, collaboration and social networking software into a cohesive work environment that is accessible from the Internet. IntraLinks Exchanges can be configured for a variety of uses, including the facilitation and management of a number of transactions and matters such as loan syndications, mergers and acquisitions, clinical trials support, investor reporting and capital management.

Users access and work in IntraLinks Exchanges primarily through a simple, intuitive and easy to use browser interface. Content within an IntraLinks Exchange can be accessed through our customers’ existing operating systems with an Internet connection. Users can also easily access the system with advanced mobile devices such as iPads, iPhones and BlackBerry products. In addition, we make available advanced, on-premise tools such as IntraLinks Designer for administrators and other users to simplify the uploading, organization and management of content. For example, IntraLinks Designer facilitates activities such as adding files and folders in bulk, dynamically indexing information and setting permissions for multiple users and user groups.

Inherent in each IntraLinks Exchange is the ability to manage content. This includes not only standard document management capabilities such as the ability to monitor document use to maintain version control, but also more sophisticated permissioning capabilities, such as document locking and protection, that can watermark content and control a user’s ability to view, print, forward and save content stored on the IntraLinks Exchange. Document locking and protection can be configured for users and groups on a bulk or per document basis.

To protect and secure the IntraLinks Exchange environment and its content, disaster recovery services, virus scanning and protection and automated backups are included as an ongoing component of our service offering. We also provide a comprehensive Archiving Service that includes a complete electronic copy of all documents, access history, historical permissions and electronic communications sent through an IntraLinks Exchange. Detailed and auditable records demonstrate disclosure, should legal or other compliance challenges arise, and satisfy additional company and regulatory record-keeping requirements.
IntraLinks Courier

IntraLinks Courier is an enterprise-class managed file transfer service that allows individuals and groups to support ad-hoc inter-enterprise collaboration allowing the exchange of content through the firewall in a controlled, secure and auditable manner. It is designed to enable the secure exchange of critical information among individuals and groups on a more one-off, ad hoc basis than an IntraLinks Exchange, which is designed for more sustained content sharing and collaboration.

IntraLinks Courier integrates the advanced capabilities of the IntraLinks Platform, including tracking and reporting, access history for compliance support, document-level restrictions for printing, forwarding and saving, and watermark security. Because the content is stored on the IntraLinks Platform, users can restrict file access to intended recipients and revoke access privileges even after packages are sent. Users access the IntraLinks Courier service through a simple web interface, a desktop application or an email plug in. IntraLinks Courier eliminates the file size limitations and inherent risk of email and file transfer protocol, or FTP, servers and the time and cost associated with overnight mail and physical couriers.
IntraLinks Technology and Integration Services

The IntraLinks Platform provides technology environment for building business applications and integrating with existing enterprise software applications. Through our technology, integrators and third party developers have the ability to create and deploy new business applications customized to specific customer requirements. Additionally, they can connect and integrate IntraLinks Exchanges with existing content management systems and collaboration services, as well as manage workflow and information exchange between systems. Key elements include:
• IntraLinks Application Programming Interfaces or APIs: IntraLinks APIs include a broad set of functionality and a comprehensive API map to manage and control content, users, sessions and system administration. They are developed on the representational state transfer, or REST, architecture making them web services ready and are used extensively by our internal development teams to create all IntraLinks applications.
• IntraLinks Adapters: IntraLinks Adapters are .NET applications that enable communications between IntraLinks and external systems. IntraLinks Adapters include pre-packaged functionality such as contact management, file management and basic system configuration.

• IntraLinks Connectors: IntraLinks Connectors are software hooks designed to connect and integrate IntraLinks with the APIs of specific external systems, like Microsoft SharePoint. Our connectors are “out-of-the-box” offerings for external integration and include packaged services for file transfer, permissioning, reporting and workflow.
IntraLinks Customer Service

Our customer facing teams provide a range of implementation and end-user support services to ensure that our customers remain productive through the duration of their use of our services.
Implementation Services:
• Requirements consultation and solution development: We engage with customers to understand their unique business processes and analyze and identify their service requirements to assist with the optimal configuration of the IntraLinks Exchange environment.
• Project management: We develop an action and training plan to accelerate the integration and rollout of the IntraLinks Solution within the customer’s organization.
• Training: We provide administrator and end-user training, including end-user certifications to meet specific industry requirements in areas such as life sciences.
• Document scanning and upload: We provide services as required to organize and scan customer documents and to automate the data upload process.

Our online solutions are critical to enable time-sensitive transactions and communications. We therefore aim to provide excellent customer service to enable our customers to complete their business processes and objectives in a timely and cost-effective manner. Our customer service team provides live support 24 hours per day, 7 days per week and 365 days per year for all users, regardless of whether they are direct customers or invited users to an IntraLinks Exchange. Customer service and support is a regular component of our value proposition. This support model is a significant differentiator from alternative applications that restrict information to within the firewall. Because many of the organizations and business processes supported by our online IntraLinks Exchanges are global and involve international communication and collaboration, we support customer inquiries in over 140 languages.
Our Technology

We have built a highly secure and scalable, cloud-based, multi-tenant platform upon which we develop solutions that allow our customers to collaborate and manage and exchange critical information across organizational and geographic boundaries. Our third-generation IntraLinks Platform is optimized to service all of our customers from a single central software instance. Unlike enterprise software vendors, we do not need to custom-build software to deploy our technology into different environments or to address industry-specific needs. Consequently, we do not need to manage and support multiple versions of our software, and we do not need to expend effort to customize support for different hardware, operating systems or databases. Our platform combines our proprietary code with integrated components from third-party vendors.

The IntraLinks Platform can be accessed universally from a simple web browser, yet has a rich customer interface powered by Adobe Flex that supports familiar desktop tools. These include drag-and-drop capabilities, right-click menus and dynamic easy-to-use reporting features, making it easy to get started quickly and effortlessly. We also utilize Microsoft .NET technologies for desktop integration and MOSS integration toolkits and make extensive use of Web 2.0 technologies, such as AJAX and Flash, for improved usability and performance and to deliver a rich and highly interactive experience. Our technology platform includes an integrated full text search capability that performs real time data categorization and tagging of content, along with dynamic facet generation to help users quickly navigate search results. In addition, we utilize Akamai’s Web Application Accelerator and IP Application Accelerator services to enable consistently high performance for users around the world. We also employ virtualization and load balancing technologies to enable seamless scalability of our infrastructure across all computing tiers.

We have built a highly sophisticated authentication, authorization and encryption service designed to ensure that the content stored in our system is accessible only by authorized users. We employ a wide range of technical security features, including two factor authentication using RSA Adaptive Authentication and data encryption with encoded session identifications and passwords. Every file we transmit from an exchange is encrypted to the end user via a Secure Socket Layer, or SSL, transaction. We also use encryption technology in our storage systems and backup tapes. Our platform also incorporates sophisticated information rights management and permissioning controls that enable our customers to control the role and access of participants to information within an exchange. Our platform provides audit trails for compliance and access history tracking throughout the entire lifecycle of the content of each exchange.

To demonstrate that we have established effective operational control objectives and activities, we undergo annual audits conducted by an outside service auditor, in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ audit guide titled, “Reports on Controls at a Service Organization over Security, Availability, Processing, Integrity, Confidentiality or Privacy”. The successful completion of these audits, and the issuance of the outside service auditor’s report, provides independent validation that our control activities and processes are effective and can be relied upon by our customers.

The IntraLinks Platform is hosted in three secure data centers provided by SunGard Availability Services LP that are run in primary and secondary mode with redundancy and failover capability. Physical security at these facilities includes a continually staffed security station along with biometric and man trap access controls. Systems are protected by firewalls and encryption technology. Each data center features redundant power, on-site backup generators, and environmental controls and monitoring. As part of our disaster recovery arrangements, all customer data is replicated to all sites in near real-time. Our hosting providers conduct regular security audits of our infrastructure and we also employ outside vendors for managed network security and monitoring 24 hours per day, 7 days per week and 365 days per year. The performance of our application suite is continually monitored using a variety of automated tools, and customer data is regularly backed up and stored on-site and off-site in secure locations to minimize the risk of data loss at any facility.
Sales and Marketing

We have developed a strong sales and marketing capability aimed at accelerating the adoption of our solutions by expanding the penetration of existing industries, capitalizing on new opportunities in underpenetrated or emerging industries, and by continually increasing our geographic coverage.
Sales

We sell our solutions through an internal sales force, a referral network and a select group of channel partners. As of December 31, 2011 our direct sales, product marketing and sales support staff consisted of 232 full-time employees. Our sales representatives have extensive experience selling technology solutions into a wide variety of industries including financial services, insurance, energy and utilities, and life sciences.

In addition to our direct sales force, we have established relationships with channel partners that promote, sell and support our services in specific geographies. Our channel partners include, among others, systems integrators, resellers, financial printers, services partners and consultants that resell our services directly or through referral business. Our key channel partners are located in a variety of countries including India, Japan, Brazil, and South Africa.
Marketing

Marketing supports our sales efforts through thought leadership and brand awareness activities, lead generation programs, and the unique positioning of our offerings. On March 1, 2012, we launched a new thought leadership platform called, the “Extended Enterprise,” which addresses enterprises’ growing need to securely collaborate with customers and business partners without discarding the protection provided by their own firewalls. In conjunction with this thought leadership launch, we have rebranded our solutions into two distinctive offerings called, “IntraLinks Connect” and “IntraLinks Dealspace”.

IntraLinks Dealspace is an offering that includes our traditional solutions for securely facilitating mergers and acquisitions, syndicated loan transactions and other time limited transactions. IntraLinks Connect is an enterprise-grade offering that enables employees across all departments of an enterprise to share content and collaborate beyond the firewall in a way that ensures adherence to management-level control, security, auditability and compliance requirements.

In connection with the launch of the IntraLinks Connect and IntraLinks Dealspace offerings, we have engaged in new marketing initiatives. These initiatives have included the launch of our new website with new images and messaging around the concept of the Extended Enterprise. Additionally, the use of print and online advertising campaigns and the utilization of enhanced search engine marketing and search engine optimization are enabling us to seek new business opportunities within the Enterprise markets. We continue to maintain our traditional marketing initiatives including the use of our website and blog to provide information about our company and solutions. Additionally, we pursue the cooperative marketing efforts with our channel partners and participate and sponsor user conferences, trade shows and industry events. Other traditional marketing initiatives have included advertisements in newspapers, trade magazines, management journals and other business related periodicals, and the placement of customer success stories and other relevant content in appropriate print and online media. Our success in selling our solutions to customers across more than 30 different industries provides us with a significant number of reference accounts, enhancing our ability to market and sell to new customers.
Research and Development

Under our SaaS model, we maintain and support only one version of our software. Our use of a common, multi-tenant application architecture enables us to provide all of our customers with a solution based on a single instance of our application. In addition, we are able to simultaneously upgrade all of our customers with each new software release. This enables us to focus our research and development expenditures on developing new features and functionality, rather than implementation. Our development process follows our own iterative methodology that includes elements of the Agile and Waterfall methodologies with multiple quality control cycles to ensure high quality and an on-going update capability.

As of December 31, 2011, our research and development group consisted of 125 employees based in New York, Boston and various other locations. Our total product development cost, which includes product development expenses and capitalized software, was approximately $24.5 million in 2009, $34.1 million in 2010 and $37.3 million in 2011.
Competition

The market for our solutions is highly competitive, fragmented and dynamic. We compete with a multitude of service providers, including both virtual data room providers and enterprise software providers. We expect to encounter increased competition, both domestically and internationally, from established software companies as well as newer entrants to the market for online content-sharing services.

We believe that the principal competitive factors in our market primarily include the ability to collaborate inside and outside firewalls while maintaining security, control, auditability and compliance standards. Additionally, our industry-specific expertise, global customer support, scalability and reliability to ensure uninterrupted performance as well as price and functionality have allowed us to maintain the reputation of trust with our customers.

We believe we compete effectively based on our capabilities across all of these factors. In particular, our solutions are specifically designed for inter-enterprise collaboration that allows content and information sharing through the firewall. We provide a technology platform that offers enterprise class scalability and reliability, while enabling secure, auditable and compliant information exchange, via a SaaS delivery model that lowers total cost of ownership.

CEO BACKGROUND

Habib Kairouz has served as one of our directors since 2001. Mr. Kairouz is a Managing Partner of Rho Capital Partners, Inc., an investment and venture capital management company, which he joined in 1993. Prior to joining Rho, Mr. Kairouz worked for five years in investment banking and leveraged buyouts with Reich & Co. and Jesup & Lamont. Mr. Kairouz also serves on the board of directors of Bluefly, Inc. and ReachLocal, Inc., both companies presently listed on NASDAQ, and other private companies. In addition, Mr. Kairouz served on the board of directors of iVillage Inc., a NASDAQ-listed company, from 1998 until it was acquired in 2006 by NBC Universal. Mr. Kairouz holds an M.B.A. from Columbia University and a B.S. from Cornell University. We believe Mr. Kairouz’s qualifications to sit on our board of directors include his substantial experience in the development of technology companies, having served on the board of directors on various public and private companies. As a Managing Partner of Rho Capital Partners, Inc., one of our largest stockholders since 2001, Mr. Kairouz has been crucial to our success during his long tenure on our board of directors.

Robert C. McBride has served as one of our directors since June 2008. Mr. McBride served as the Chief Financial Officer of Iona Technologies, a public software and services company, from February 2006 until his retirement in February 2008. From June 2001 to September 2005, Mr. McBride was the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ascential Software Corporation (“Ascential”), a public company and leading provider of enterprise data integration software, which was acquired by IBM in May 2005. Prior to that, Mr. McBride held a 17-year tenure at Data General Corporation (now part of EMC Corporation) during which he held various roles of increasing responsibility, including Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, Corporate Controller and Corporate Treasurer, among other senior financial management positions. He served on the board of directors of Arbor Networks, a private U.S.-based network security products, services and solutions company, until its sale in 2010. Mr. McBride holds an M.B.A. from Washington University and a B.A. from Ohio Wesleyan University. Because of Mr. McBride’s over 35 year record of serving on the board of directors of several companies and his prior public company experience as Chief Financial Officer of Ascential, Iona Technologies and various other financial management positions with large software and technology companies, we believe Mr. McBride qualified to sit on our board of directors and is able to provide valuable input into our strategic and financial affairs, as well as other matters.

Patrick J. Wack, Jr. has served as one of our directors since March 2002 and has served as the Chairman of our board of directors since September 2007. Mr. Wack has served as a Venture Partner and independent consultant to Rho Capital Partners, Inc. since December 2008. Mr. Wack served as our President and Chief Executive Officer from March 2002 to August 2007, our Executive Vice President of Business Development from September 1999 to January 2002, and our Chief Operating Officer from July 1997 to September 1999. Prior to IntraLinks, Mr. Wack was a director and Chief Operating Officer of Professional Sports Care Management, Inc., a publicly-traded provider of outpatient physical therapy services. In addition to IntraLinks, Mr. Wack presently serves on the boards of directors of several private companies. Mr. Wack holds a B.S. from Princeton University. Because of Mr. Wack’s long history with us and strong leadership and management background, we believe he is ideally qualified to serve as our Chairman.

Ronald W. Hovsepian has served as one of our directors since December 2011. Mr. Hovsepian was appointed President, Chief Executive Officer and Director on December 15, 2011. Prior to joining us, Mr. Hovsepian most recently served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Novell, Inc. from 2006 until Novell’s acquisition by the Attachmate Group in April 2011. He joined Novell in 2003 as Executive Vice President and President, Worldwide Field Operations and served as President and Chief Operating Officer from 2005 until his appointment as Chief Executive Officer in 2006. Prior to his time at Novell, Mr. Hovsepian was a Managing Director with Bear Stearns Asset Management, a technology venture capital fund, from February to December 2002. From March 2000 to February 2002, Mr. Hovsepian served as Managing Director for Internet Capital Group, a venture capital firm. Prior to that, Mr. Hovsepian served in a number of executive positions with International Business Machines Corporation over approximately a 17-year period. Mr. Hovsepian is also Chairman of the Board of Directors of Ann Taylor Corporation and is a member of the Board of Directors of ANSYS, Inc. We believe Mr. Hovsepian’s qualifications to sit on our board of directors include his extensive experience as an executive in the technology field.

Brian J. Conway has served as one of our directors since June 2007. Mr. Conway is a Managing Director, the head of the Boston office technology group, and on the executive committee of TA Associates, L.P., a prominent growth private equity firm, which he joined in August 1984. Prior to his time at TA Associates, L.P., Mr. Conway worked in mergers and acquisitions and corporate finance for Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated. Mr. Conway holds an M.B.A. from Stanford University and a B.A. from Amherst College. As a Managing Director of TA Associates, L.P., our largest stockholder that acquired a controlling interest in June 2007, Mr. Conway has a thorough understanding of our business and industry and has been instrumental in our development. We believe that Mr. Conway is qualified to sit on our board of directors because he brings substantial investing experience in growth-oriented technology companies, having invested in and served on the board of directors of numerous public and private companies.

Peter Gyenes has served as one of our directors since March 2008. On October 27, 2011, the Board elected Mr. Gyenes as the Board’s Lead Independent Director. Mr. Gyenes has served as the non-executive Chairman of Sophos plc, a privately held global security software company, since May 2006. Mr. Gyenes served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ascential, a market leader in data integration software, and its predecessor companies VMark Software, Ardent Software and Informix from 1996 until it was acquired by IBM in May 2005. Mr. Gyenes also serves on the board of directors of RealPage, Inc., a provider of property management software, Pegasystems, Inc., a provider of business process management software and services, VistaPrint Limited, a global e-commerce provider of marketing services to small business, and Epicor Software Corporation, a provider of software solutions to the manufacturing, distribution, retail and services industries. In addition, Mr. Gyenes served on the board of directors of Lawson Software, Inc., a provider of enterprise applications software from 2006 to 2011, Applix, Inc., a business intelligence software company from 2000 to 2007, BladeLogic, Inc., a data center automation company, from 2006 to 2008, Netezza Corporation (“Netezza”), a provider of data warehouse appliances, from 2008 to 2010, and webMethods, Inc., an enterprise integration software business, from 2005 to 2007. Mr. Gyenes is also a trustee emeritus of the Massachusetts Technology Leadership Council. Mr. Gyenes holds an M.B.A. and a B.A. from Columbia University. We believe that Mr. Gyenes is qualified to sit on our board of directors because he brings over 40 years of experience in technology, sales, marketing, and general management within the computer systems and software industry in the Americas, Europe and Asia/Pacific. He currently serves and has served on the board of directors of public and private companies and has extensive experience with strategic acquisitions and divestitures, team building and corporate governance.

Thomas Hale has served as one of our directors since April 2008. Mr. Hale has served as the Chief Product Officer of Homeaway.com, Inc, a private software firm, since July 2010. Mr. Hale has served as the Chief Product Officer of Linden Lab, a private software firm, from October 2008 to June 2010. Mr. Hale served as an Entrepreneur in Residence at Redpoint Ventures, a venture capital firm, from December 2007 to October 2008. Mr. Hale was Senior Vice President/General Manager of the Knowledge Worker business unit, of Adobe, Inc. (“Adobe”), a software firm, where he was in charge of strategy and execution for core Adobe franchises like Adobe Acrobat and Acrobat Connect Professional, a flash-based web conferencing solution, from October 2005 to October 2007. From April 1995 to October 2005, Mr. Hale was Senior Vice President/General Manager of the communications, publishing and training division at Macromedia, Inc. (“Macromedia”), which was later acquired by Adobe, where he led the company into the web collaboration market with its first Software as a Service offering. Mr. Hale holds a B.A. from Harvard University. In addition, at Macromedia, Mr. Hale served as an executive officer where he participated in the operations, governance, and administration of a public company of a similar scale to us. In addition, during his tenure at Redpoint Ventures, Mr. Hale engaged with many companies that comprise the technology and competitive landscape relevant to us. We believe that Mr. Hale’s qualifications to sit on our board of directors include his extensive experience in enterprise collaboration, content and document management, and software as a service, encompassing operating disciplines ranging from product development, strategy, sales and marketing, and operations.

J. Chris Scalet has served as one of our directors since April 2011. Mr. Scalet is currently executive vice president, Global Services and chief information officer (CIO) at Merck, a global research-driven pharmaceutical company headquartered in Whitehouse Station, New Jersey. Mr. Scalet has served as CIO since joining Merck in March 2003 and as executive vice president, Global Services since January 2008. Prior to joining Merck, Mr. Scalet was senior vice president, information technology and CIO at International Paper from 1998 to 2003 and vice president, information technology and CIO at MAPCO, Inc. from 1993 to 1997. In addition, Mr. Scalet served on the board of directors of Netezza, a provider of data warehouse appliances, from June 2009 to November 2010. We believe that Mr. Scalet’s leadership experience and deep knowledge of information technology and services as well as his expertise in complex global enterprises will add valuable insight to our board our directors as we continue to drive growth within our Enterprise principal market.

MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION FROM LATEST 10K

Overview

IntraLinks is a leading global provider of Software-as-a-Service (“SaaS”) solutions for securely managing content, exchanging critical business information and collaborating within and among organizations. Our cloud-based solutions enable organizations to control, track, search and exchange time-sensitive information inside and outside the firewall, all within a secure and easy-to-use environment. Our customers rely on our cost-effective solutions to manage large amounts of electronic information, accelerate information intensive business processes, reduce time to market, optimize critical information workflow, meet regulatory and risk management requirements and collaborate with business counterparties in a secure, auditable and compliant manner. We help our customers eliminate many of the inherent risks and inefficiencies of using email, fax, courier services and other existing solutions to collaborate and exchange information.

At our founding in 1996, we introduced cloud-based collaboration for the debt capital markets industry and, shortly thereafter, extended our solutions to merger and acquisition transactions. Today, we service enterprise and governmental agencies in over 63 countries across a variety of industries, including financial services, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, consumer, energy, industrial, legal, insurance, real estate and technology, which use our solutions for the secure management and online exchange of information within and among organizations. Across all of our principal markets, we help transform a wide range of slow, expensive and information-intensive tasks into streamlined, efficient and real-time business processes.

We deliver our solutions entirely through a multi-tenant SaaS architecture in which a single instance of our software serves all of our customers. We sell our solutions directly through an internal sales team with industry-specific expertise, and indirectly through a customer referral network and channel partners. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we generated $213.5 million in revenue, of which approximately 40% was derived from international sales across 63 countries.
Key Metrics

We evaluate our operating and financial performance using various performance indicators, as well as the macroeconomic trends affecting the demand for our solutions in our principal markets. We also monitor relevant industry performance, including transactional activity in the debt capital markets and M&A market globally, to provide insight into the success of our sales activities as compared to our peers and to estimate our market share in each of our principal markets.

Components of Operating Results
Sources of Revenue

We derive revenue principally through fixed commitment contracts under which we provide customers with various services, including access to our cloud-based IntraLinks Platform, access to one or more of our IntraLinks Exchanges, the related customer support and other services. Our management operates the business in one reportable segment, assessing performance and making operating decisions based on one single operating unit. However, to date we have monitored certain revenue metrics and trends by principal markets, as defined below. We also monitor the mix of “subscription” and “transaction” customers within these markets, as well as revenue growth in international locations.

The following represent our principal markets:
• Enterprise comprises customers spanning a variety of industries, including financial services, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, consumer, energy, industrial, legal, insurance, real estate and technology, who use our services for a wide range of corporate purposes, primarily under subscription arrangements.
• Mergers & Acquisitions (“M&A”) comprises customers, across the same variety of industries described above, who use our exchanges for project-based transactions, such as mergers, acquisitions and dispositions. These customers are referred to us typically by financial or legal advisors involved in the respective transactions. This principal market is generally characterized by the use of our IntraLinks Platform under transaction arrangements.
• Debt Capital Markets (“DCM”) primarily comprises customers within the financial services industry who use our exchanges for loan syndication and administration, and is generally characterized by the use of our IntraLinks Platform under subscription arrangements.

We believe our revenue growth will be driven by the following key trends: expanded geographic focus to establish wider distribution of our services, ongoing investment in our platform to continue to meet customer needs, and increased focus on providing the types of services that generate repeat business and expand our subscription base. Our revenue growth will also be driven by our ability to increase our market share by winning business from our competition and by adding new clients that are not yet taking advantage of services such as ours. We believe that the continued investments in our platform and operational infrastructure will allow us to service more clients, including those with larger-scale requirements.

Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2011 we received insurance proceeds totaling $0.6 million, as a result of one of our primary facilities sustaining water damage from a fire on a floor above, which resulted in an interruption in our operations. We filed a claim under our business interruption insurance policy for lost revenue caused by the down-time experienced subsequent to the loss event. The business interruption insurance proceeds are classified as “Other revenue” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue primarily consists of (i) personnel-related costs, including non-cash stock-based compensation, (ii) expenses for third-party contractors providing customer support and project management services, (iii) expenses related to hosting our service, including Internet connectivity, co-location management and data storage fees, (iv) depreciation expenses for hardware, (v) amortization expenses associated with capitalized software and definite-lived intangible assets and (vi) allocated overhead. Our hosting provider charges us a monthly fee based on the number of servers, the amount of storage and the levels of network connectivity required. We allocate overhead, such as facilities and telecommunication charges, to all departments based on headcount, which we consider to be a fair and representative means of allocation. As such, general overhead expenses are reflected in our cost of revenue and operating expenses categories.

We will continue to make investments in our platform and services, which may include direct investments in our technology, customer services group and our hosting infrastructure. The level and timing of investments in these areas could affect our cost of revenue, both in terms of absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenue.

Gross Profit and Gross Margin

Our gross profit and margin are driven by our ability to manage the costs of providing our service as revenue increases or decreases. As noted under “Cost of Revenue” above, we intend to continue making investments in personnel, including our customer service group, and other initiatives directly related to the development of our technology.
Operating Expenses

Product Development — Product development expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs, including non-cash stock-based compensation, and consulting expenses associated with the design, development and testing of our systems. We capitalize direct costs of services used in developing internal-use software, including both internal and external direct labor costs. Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage, as well as maintenance and training costs are expensed as incurred.

We expect that product development expenses will increase in absolute dollars as we extend our service offerings and develop new technologies to ensure our service integrates and performs well with existing and future leading databases, applications, operating systems and other platforms, and keeps pace with technological change in our industry. Depending on the nature and levels of work undertaken, the amount of product development costs that are capitalized may fluctuate from period to period, which may affect operating expenses, both in terms of absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenue.

Sales and Marketing — Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs, including commissions paid to our sales representatives and non-cash stock-based compensation for equity granted to our sales and marketing staff. Sales and marketing expenses also include payments to channel partners, costs of marketing programs and amortization expense for certain definite-lived intangible assets. Our marketing programs include advertising, events and conferences, corporate communications, public relations and other brand building and product marketing expenses.

We expect that sales and marketing expenses will increase in absolute dollars as we invest in additional direct sales personnel in order to add new customers in our existing markets and geographical locations, as well as in emerging global markets. Additionally, we intend to focus on expanding our partnering efforts and allocating more resources to marketing activities, including building greater brand awareness and sponsoring additional marketing events.

General and Administrative — General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs, including non-cash stock-based compensation, for our finance and accounting, legal, human resources, administrative, and internal business systems personnel, as well as non-personnel costs such as professional fees and other corporate and public company expenses.

We expect that general and administrative expenses will increase in absolute dollars in connection with our continued efforts to add personnel, lease additional office space and incur additional professional and legal fees, insurance costs and other expenses in connection with our growth and international expansion, our growing compliance requirements as a public company, and our ongoing legal proceedings and regulatory investigations.
Restructuring Costs

Restructuring costs incurred during 2009 included employee severance and other employee-related termination costs. The 2009 plan primarily involved a reorganization of our sales and sales supporting operation functions and was designed to enable us to operate more efficiently in a still uncertain economic environment and for continued expansion of our services into broader markets.
Non-Operating Expenses

Non-operating expenses consist of: (i) interest expense related to our long-term debt, net of interest income generated from our short-term investments, (ii) amortization of debt issuance costs, which are being amortized over the remaining life of loan, (iii) foreign currency transactions gains and losses, primarily driven by fluctuations between the U.S. Dollar, Pound Sterling and Euro, and (iv) fair value adjustments to our interest rate swap.

In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2010, non-operating expenses included a loss on extinguishment of debt related to the repayment of our Holdings Senior PIK Credit Agreement (the “PIK Loan”) and the accelerated recognition of deferred debt issuance costs due to the repayment of outstanding amounts under our PIK Loan and Second Lien Credit Facility, in 2010, using the net proceeds from our August 2010 initial and our December 2010 and April 2011 follow-on public offerings. See Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this Form 10-K for additional details regarding the extinguishment of the PIK Loan and accelerated recognition of deferred debt issuance costs.
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)

We are subject to income tax in the United States as well as other countries in which we conduct business. Earnings from our non-U.S. activities are subject to local country income tax and may also be subject to current U.S. income tax. Our effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate primarily as a result of stock-based compensation, other non-deductible expenses, research and development tax credits and foreign operations.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities on an ongoing basis. We evaluate these estimates including those related to the determination of the fair value of stock options and estimated forfeitures of equity-based awards, the fair value of our reporting unit, valuation of intangible assets (and their related useful lives), fair value of financial instruments, certain components of the income tax provisions, including valuation allowances on the Company’s deferred tax assets, accruals for certain compensation expenses, allowances for doubtful accounts and reserves for customer credits. We base estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Actual results may differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements. For further information on our critical and other significant accounting policies, see Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies , of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Revenue Recognition — We derive revenue principally through fixed commitment contracts under which we provide customers various services, including access to our cloud-based IntraLinks Platform, including our IntraLinks Exchanges, as well as the related customer support and other services.

We sell our services under service contracts that we consider either “subscription” or “transaction” arrangements, as follows:
• Subscription arrangements include those customer contracts with an initial term of 12 months or more that automatically renew for successive terms of at least 12 months. Because some long-term customers will not accept automatic renewal terms, we also consider among our subscription customers those whose contracts have been extended upon mutual agreement for at least one renewal term of at least 12 months. We believe subscription arrangements appeal mainly to customers that have integrated our service into their business processes and plan to use our exchanges for a series of expected projects. Subscription arrangements afford customers several benefits, including the ability to manage the creation, opening and closing of any number of exchanges at their convenience during the commitment period, and potentially lower pricing than they would generally be charged under a single-event contract.
• Transaction arrangements include those customer contracts having an initial term of less than 12 months. We also consider transaction customers to be those first time customers whose contracts do not have an automatic renewal clause, and who have not yet renewed their contracts by mutual agreement. We believe these types of arrangements appeal mainly to customers who have a single discrete project. Unlike subscription contracts, which generally renew for at least one year at a time, transaction contracts continue in effect after their initial term on a month to month basis, until the customer terminates, often by closing the relevant exchange.

Revenue from both subscription and transaction contracts is recognized ratably over the contracted service period, provided that there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the service has been provided to the customer, collection is reasonably assured, the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable and we have no significant remaining obligation at the completion of the contracted term. In circumstances where we have a significant remaining obligation after completion of the initial contract term, revenue is recognized ratably over the extended service period. Our contracts do not contain general rights of return. Certain of our contracts contain customer acceptance clauses, for which revenue is deferred until acceptance occurs.

Under most subscription arrangements, an annual fixed commitment fee is determined based on the aggregate value of the expected number of exchanges required over the term, the type of exchanges expected to be opened, the number of users that are expected to access each exchange and the volume of data expected to be managed in the exchanges. We bill customers with annual commitment fees in advance, generally in four equal quarterly installments. Similarly, a transaction contract for a single project will have a fee covering services for the expected duration of the project, for which we generally bill customers in full, in advance, upon the commencement of the contract. Subscription and transaction fees payable in advance are recorded initially in accounts receivable, or cash upon their collection, and deferred revenue, until such time that the relevant revenue recognition criteria have been met for such amounts to be included in revenue.

Annual subscription fees, as well as the fixed fees payable upfront under transaction contracts, are payable in full and are non-refundable regardless of actual usage of services. Similarly, while customers may close exchanges and cease using services, our contracts generally do not allow for cancellation or termination for convenience during the contract term. We reserve the right under subscription and transaction contracts to charge customers for loading data or adding users to exchanges in excess of their original usage estimates. Incremental fees for overages are billed monthly or quarterly in arrears and the related revenue is recognized ratably from the point that the overage is measured through the remaining contract term, or the remaining contract quarter, depending on the usage terms within the customer contract.

Our customers do not have a contractual right, or the ability, to take possession of the IntraLinks software at any time during the hosting period, or to contract with an unrelated third party to host the IntraLinks software. Therefore, revenue recognition for our services is not accounted for under the FASB’s specific guidance on software revenue recognition. We recognize revenue for our services ratably over the related service period, as described above.

We offer our services to customers through single-element and multiple-element arrangements, some of which contain offerings for optional services, including document scanning, data archiving and other professional services. In accordance with the FASB’s guidance on multiple-deliverable arrangements, we have evaluated the deliverables in our arrangements to determine whether they represent separate units of accounting, specifically whether the deliverables have value to our customers on a standalone basis. We have determined that the services delivered to customers under our existing arrangements generally represent a single unit of accounting. Revenue for optional services is recognized as delivered, or as completed, provided that the general revenue recognition criteria described above are met. We will continue to evaluate the nature of the services offered to customers under our fixed commitment contracts, as well as our pricing practices, to determine if a change in policy regarding multiple-element arrangements and related disclosures is warranted in future periods.

Additionally, certain contracts contain provisions for set-up and implementation services relating to the customer’s use of our platform. We believe that these set-up and implementation services provide value to the customer over the entire period that the exchange is active, including renewal periods, and therefore the revenue related to these services is recognized over the longer of the contract term or the estimated relationship life, which, as of December 31, 2011, generally ranged from two to four years. We continue to evaluate the length of the amortization period of the revenue related to set up and implementation fees, as we gain more experience with customer contract renewals. From time to time we agree to sales concessions with our customers; a reserve for which is estimated based on historical patterns of actual credits issued. Expenses associated with maintaining this reserve are recorded as a reduction to revenue.

Deferred revenue represents the billed but unearned portion of existing contracts for services to be provided. Deferred revenue does not include the unbilled portion of existing contractual commitments of our customers. Accordingly, the deferred revenue balance does not represent the total contract value of outstanding arrangements. Amounts that have been invoiced but not yet collected are recorded as revenue or deferred revenue, as appropriate, and are included in our accounts receivable balances. Deferred revenue that will be recognized during the subsequent 12-month period is classified as “Deferred revenue” with the remaining portion as non-current deferred revenue as a component of “Other long-term liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Stock-Based Compensation — We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of options granted under our 2007 Stock Option and Grant Plan and 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, as well as the rights awarded under our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”). Using this model, fair value is calculated based on assumptions with respect to (i) expected volatility of the our Common Stock price, (ii) the expected life of the award, which for options is the period of time over which employees and board directors are expected to hold their options prior to exercise and for ESPP rights is the period of time between the offering date and the exercise date (as defined in Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements), (iii) expected dividend yield on our Common Stock, and (iv) a risk-free interest rate, which is based on quoted U.S. Treasury rates for securities with maturities approximating the expected term. The use of different assumptions in the Black-Scholes pricing model would result in different amounts of stock-based compensation expense. Furthermore, if different assumptions are used in future periods, stock-based compensation expense could be materially impacted in the future.

MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION FOR LATEST QUARTER

Overview

IntraLinks is a leading global provider of Software-as-a-Service (“SaaS”) solutions for securely managing content, exchanging critical business information and collaborating within and among organizations. Our cloud-based solutions enable organizations to control, track, search and exchange time-sensitive information inside and outside the firewall, all within a secure and easy-to-use environment. Our customers rely on our cost-effective solutions to manage large amounts of electronic information, accelerate information intensive business processes, reduce time to market, optimize critical information workflow, meet regulatory and risk management requirements and collaborate with business counterparties in a secure, auditable and compliant manner. We help our customers eliminate many of the inherent risks and inefficiencies of using email, fax, courier services and other existing solutions to collaborate and exchange information.

At our founding in 1996, we introduced cloud-based collaboration for the debt capital markets industry and, shortly thereafter, extended our solutions to merger and acquisition transactions. Today, we service enterprise and governmental agencies in over 58 countries across a variety of industries, including financial services, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, consumer, energy, industrial, legal, insurance, real estate and technology, which use our solutions for the secure management and online exchange of information within and among organizations. Across all of our principal markets, we help transform a wide range of slow, expensive and information-intensive tasks into streamlined, efficient and real-time business processes.

We deliver our solutions entirely through a multi-tenant SaaS architecture in which a single instance of our software serves all of our customers. We sell our solutions directly through an enterprise sales team with industry-specific expertise, and indirectly through a customer referral network and channel partners. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we generated $104.6 million in revenue, of which approximately 39% was derived from international sales across 58 countries.

During the second quarter of 2012, management initiated a business strategy review to explore long-term growth opportunities. The objective was to assess the competitive environment, identify the most attractive market opportunities, and further develop our execution strategy. We have made significant progress in validating our market opportunities and aligning the company to effectively address them. This strategic assessment reinforces our commitment to anticipate the changing needs of our customers, industry trends, and competitive forces.
Key Metrics

We evaluate our operating and financial performance using various performance indicators, as well as against the macroeconomic trends affecting the demand for our solutions in our principal markets. We also monitor relevant industry performance, including transactional activity in the Debt Capital Markets (“DCM”) and the Mergers & Acquisitions (“M&A”) market globally, to provide insight into the success of our sales activities as compared to our peers and to estimate our market share in each of our principal markets.

Our management relies on the key performance indicators set forth below to help us evaluate growth trends, establish budgets, measure the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts and assess operational efficiencies. We discuss revenue under “Results of Operations”, and cash flow provided by operating activities, including deferred revenue, under “Liquidity and Capital Resources”. Other measures of our performance, including adjusted gross margin, adjusted operating income, adjusted net income, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin, and free cash flow are defined and discussed under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities on an ongoing basis. We evaluate these estimates including those related to the determination of the fair value of stock options and estimated forfeitures of equity-based awards, the fair value of our reporting unit, valuation of intangible assets (and their related useful lives), fair value of financial instruments, certain components of the income tax provisions, including valuation allowances on the Company’s deferred tax assets, accruals for certain compensation expenses, allowances for doubtful accounts and reserves for customer credits. We base estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Actual results may differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, there were no material changes to our significant accounting policies from those contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.
Goodwill Impairment Analysis

At June 30, 2012, we had $215.5 million of goodwill recorded as a result of the Merger that occurred on June 15, 2007. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis (October 1), or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have occurred. Our operations consist of one reporting unit, which is evaluated during each goodwill impairment test.

In the second quarter of 2012, we performed a goodwill impairment test as a result of the continued depressed stock price and our market capitalization relative to net book value.

In accordance with ASC 350, Goodwill and Other , goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with its goodwill carrying amount to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. In other words, the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test was performed using a combination of a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) analysis and a market-based approach. The forecasted cash flows employed in the DCF analysis were based on our most recent forecast and business plans and represent our best estimate of future results as of June 30, 2012 within a range of possible outcomes. In addition, we made the following assumptions in the DCF analysis: (i) a 5% growth factor to calculate the terminal value of our reporting unit and (ii) a 15% discount rate to calculate the terminal value of our reporting unit, both of which are consistent with rates used in the 2011 annual impairment test. The Step 1 valuation also considered our market capitalization as of the second quarter of 2012, adjusted for an estimated equity control premium of 28%.

Based on the results of our most recent Step 1 goodwill impairment test, we concluded that goodwill was not impaired as of June 30, 2012. However, our most recent goodwill impairment test showed that we could be at risk of recording a goodwill impairment in the future if, for example, our stock price remains at a depressed level or there is a negative change in our future cash flow projections.

If we performed the goodwill impairment test solely based on the outstanding stock price as of June 30, 2012 adjusted for an estimated 28% equity control premium, or if we had used a 1% higher discount rate or projections on the lower end of the range of possible outcomes in our DCF analysis, step 1 of the goodwill impairment test would have failed. We will continue to monitor the judgments and estimates used in the impairment analysis and consider future triggering events to continue to assess the recoverability of our goodwill balance.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

On May 12, 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued revised authoritative guidance covering fair value measurements and disclosures. The amended guidance include provisions for (1) the application of concepts of “highest and best use” and “valuation premises”, (2) an option to measure groups of offsetting assets and liabilities on a net basis, (3) incorporation of certain premiums and discounts in fair value measurements, and (4) measurement of the fair value of certain instruments classified in shareholders’ equity. The revised guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted this authoritative guidance effective January 1, 2012. The adoption of this authoritative guidance had no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

On June 16, 2011 the FASB issued revised authoritative guidance covering Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which revises the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in their financial statements. The revised guidance removes the presentation options in the former guidance and requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either a continuous statement of comprehensive income, or two separate but consecutive statements. The revised authoritative guidance does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income. The revised guidance is effective for interim and fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted this authoritative guidance effective January 1, 2012, and have included the presentation of comprehensive (loss) income in a separate statement that immediately follows the Consolidated Statements of Operations in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $14.7 million and $12.0 million, respectively. Cash used in investing activities included purchases of investments during the six months ended June 30, 2012 of $24.1 million consisting primarily of commercial paper and corporate bonds. Maturity of investments during the six months ended June 30, 2012 totaled $25.7 million. Cash used in investing activities related to capital expenditures for infrastructure during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $5.9 million and $3.4 million, respectively. Investments in capitalized software development costs for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were $10.4 million and $8.6 million, respectively. We anticipate capital expenditures and investments in our software development may increase in future periods, in line with our growth strategy. Capital expenditures, including capital software, are currently restricted to $35.0 million on an annual basis, under the covenants of our First Lien Credit Facility.
Financing Activities

Cash flows used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were $15.2 million, primarily due to $15.7 million of debt repayments made during the six months ended June 30, 2012, including our mandatory quarterly debt repayments and the voluntary prepayment on our First Lien Credit Facility made in April 2012.

Cash flows provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were $1.2 million, primarily consisting of $1.9 million in proceeds from the issuance of common stock, pursuant to exercises of stock options and our ESPP, as well as $35.0 million received in connection with our successful follow-on public stock offering which closed in April 2011. The cash received was partially offset by $35.2 million of debt repayment made in the six months ended June 30, 2011, including our mandatory quarterly debt repayments and our prepayment on our First Lien Credit Facility using the net proceeds from the follow-on offering. Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2011 we incurred $0.5 million of costs associated with our public offerings.

The First Lien Credit Facility provided for term loans in the aggregate principal amount of $135.0 million. Prior to June 30, 2011 each quarterly installment payment was equal to $0.3 million. The terms of our First Lien Credit Agreement require any voluntary prepayment of our term loans to be applied on a pro rata basis to each scheduled installment of principal. As of June 30, 2011, the quarterly installment payments decreased to $0.2 million, as result of the voluntary prepayment made in April 2011. Each principal payment is due on the last day of each quarter, which commenced on September 30, 2007 and continues for 27 installments, with the balance due in a final installment on June 15, 2014. Additionally, the First Lien Credit Facility includes a requirement for mandatory prepayments of 50% of our excess free cash flow as measured on an annual basis. Excess free cash flow is generally defined as our adjusted EBITDA less debt service costs, capital expenditures, current income taxes paid and any cash security deposits made in respect of leases for office space, as adjusted for changes in our working capital. As a result of our fiscal 2009 excess free cash flow, we made a mandatory prepayment on April 1, 2010 of approximately $1.2 million. In line with the terms of the First Lien Credit Agreement, an excess cash flow mandatory payment was not required for fiscal year 2010, due to our Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the credit agreement) being less than 3.25 at December 31, 2010.

The term loans under the First Lien Credit Agreement, as amended, bear interest at the higher of the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the credit agreement) or 1.50% plus 4.25% per annum, which was 5.75% at June 30, 2012. Interest payments on the First Lien Credit Facility are due on the last business day of each month. The First Lien Credit Facility also provides for a $15.0 million revolving line of credit, of which $12.9 million was unused as of June 30, 2012. As of June 30, 2012, $1.3 million of the revolving line of credit was reserved for standby letters of credit for several of our operating lease agreements related to our various office locations. Additionally, $0.8 million of the revolving line of credit was reserved for a standby letter of credit related to our corporate charge card utilized by executives and certain other employees.

The First Lien Credit Facility is secured by security interests and liens against all of our assets, including a pledge of 100% of the equity interests in our domestic subsidiaries and an obligation to pledge 65% of the equity interests in our direct foreign subsidiaries.

All obligations under the First Lien Credit Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by our direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries. These guarantees are secured by substantially all the present and future property of the guarantors.

Additionally, in July 2007, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement to fix the interest rate on our variable rate debt at 5.43% on a beginning notional amount of $170.0 million. The notional amount amortizes over a period ending June 30, 2012. In March 2009, in conjunction with the elections made on the First and Second Lien Credit Facilities variable rate bases (from three-month LIBOR to one-month LIBOR, and quarterly interest payments to monthly), we amended the interest rate swap agreement to mirror the terms of the First and Second Lien Credit Facilities. The fixed rate payable on the interest rate swap was also revised from 5.43% to 5.25%, which was the rate in effect at June 30, 2012 and 2011. The variable rate receivable is based on one-month LIBOR. Our interest rate swap agreement matured on June 30, 2012. We recognized a gain on the interest rate swap of $1,455 for the six months period ended June 30, 2012 which is included in “Other expense (income), net” on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Prior to the repayment of our Second Lien Credit Facility during the year ended December 31, 2010, the Second Lien Credit Facility provided for two tranches of term loans. Tranche B in the amount of $30.0 million and Tranche C in the amount of $35.0 million. Tranche B bore interest at the rate of 11.0% per annum and Tranche C bore interest at the Eurodollar Rate plus 5.75%, which was 6.1% at June 30, 2011.

Prior to the repayment of our PIK Loan during the year ended December 31, 2010, the PIK Loan provided for loans in the amount of $75.0 million and bore interest at a rate of 13.0% at June 30, 2011. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we elected to pay the quarterly interest of $3.2 million in cash.

Cash paid for interest on the loans described above, during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, was $4.1 million and $5.6 million, respectively.

Due to the continued positive operating performance of our business and the absence of any acquisition activity, we have not needed to borrow additional amounts under our credit facilities or obtain additional financing to fund operations and capital expenditures.
Liquidity and Capital Resources

We currently use the net cash generated from operations to fund our working capital needs and our capital expenditure requirements. Our available financing arrangements include a $15.0 million revolving line of credit, of which $12.9 million is available to us as of June 30, 2012. At June 30, 2012, we had approximately $35.4 million in cash and cash equivalents, $34.2 million in short-term investments, and $39.2 million in accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts and credit reserve. We believe that we have sufficient cash resources to continue operations for at least the next 12 to 24 months.

In connection with our initial public stock offering in August 2010 and the exercise by the underwriters of the related over-allotment option shortly thereafter, we received total net proceeds of approximately $144.8 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions. In December 2010, in connection with our follow-on public stock offering, we received net proceeds of $38.0 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions. In April 2011, in connection with our follow-on public stock offering we received net proceeds of $34.6 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions. We used substantially all of the net proceeds from our public stock offerings to repay indebtedness. We used the net proceeds from our initial public stock offering to first reduce our outstanding indebtedness under the PIK Loan, with a portion of the remaining proceeds, as well as the proceeds from the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option, to repay Tranche B and Tranche C of the Second Lien Credit Facility, on a pro rata basis. The net proceeds from the December follow-on public stock offering were used to pay the remaining outstanding balance of the Second Lien Credit Facility. The net proceeds from the April follow-on public stock offering were used to prepay a portion of the amount outstanding under our First Lien Credit Facility. Subsequently, in April 2012, we voluntarily repaid $15 million of outstanding indebtedness. This overall reduction of our outstanding indebtedness has significantly reduced the total interest expense we expect to pay on this indebtedness in future periods.

SHARE THIS PAGE:  Add to Delicious Delicious  Share    Bookmark and Share



 
Icon Legend Permissions Topic Options
You can comment on this topic
Print Topic

Email Topic

1236 Views